Revising Cook et. al. data or where do the „97%“ come from?

Cook et. al. are frequently quoted when non-scientists state that „97%“ percent of „climate scientists“ support anthropologically caused global warming (AGW) theory. We have revised raw data underdlying Cook’s study to get out the figure more exactly and to find out about potential methodological errors.

Raw data of Cook et. al. study is available on the internet:

https://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/media/erl460291datafile.txt

Over 10.000 single scientific studies have been researched by Cook et. al. wether they support AGW theory, have an indifferent position or do not. 7 categories therefore have been implemented by the authors:

  • 1, Explicitly endorses and quantifies AGW as 50+%
  • 2, Explicitly endorses but does not quantify or minimise
  • 3, Implicitly endorses AGW without minimising it
  • 4, No Position
  • 5, Implicitly minimizes/rejects AGW
  • 6, Explicitly minimizes/rejects AGW but does not quantify
  • 7, Explicitly minimizes/rejects AGW as less than 50%

(Source: Cook et. al. Raw data)

Category 1 to 3 can be seen as affirmative concerning AGW, 4 is neutral and does not give any statement, 5 to 7 deny AGW theory to a more or less extent.

Each study examined has been groupud into one catagory by Cook et. al. Categorization is found in the raw data sets by the end of each line referring to one single study. An integer number int the range of 0 < n < 8 marks the respective category an examined study has been grouped into.

To get the statistical distribution of these numbers we have written a very compact snippet of software reading the information directly from the ASCII-file and increasing a single variable counter each time a study fell into one of the 7 catagories.

The following categories were formed by Cook et. al., we obtained the respective numbers by software filtering:

Category Number
1,Explicitly endorses and quantifies AGW as 50+% : 58
2,Explicitly endorses but does not quantify or minimise 850
3,Implicitly endorses AGW without minimising it 2693
4,No Position 7321
5,Implicitly minimizes/rejects AGW 49
6,Explicitly minimizes/rejects AGW but does not quantify 13
7,Explicitly minimizes/rejects AGW as less than 50% 8

It is obvious that the figure of „97%“ of „scientists“ (what more exactly speaking must be „studies“) that support AGW is not realistic. When we set that „supporting“ studies are found only in group 1 to 3 and sum up these numbers we get a total 3601.

When the remaining groups are totaled we get 7391.

As a total of all studies this figure results in 10992.

So we can calculate that 32.7% of all examined studies support AGW to a more or less degree. On the other hand 67.2% don‘t. Having no opinion means that there is counted as NO SUPPORT entity. In addition only 7.7% of the examined stduies strongly support AGW theory.

Conclusion

Deducing that „97%“ of the >10.000 studies support AGW theory is faulty. Roughly about 30% state a support for AGC theory to a more less extent.

Appendix

Coding of the software:

Dim strS0 As String
Dim n(10) As Integer
Dim T1, I As Integer
Dim Z As Long

Open "c:\cook\data2.txt" For Input As #1
While Not EOF(1)
    Line Input #1, strS0
    Z = Z + 1
    For T1 = 1 To 7
        'Debug.Print "*" + Right$(strS0, 1) + "*"
        If Right$(strS0, 1) = Chr(T1 + 48) Then
             n(T1) = n(T1) + 1
         End If
    Next

    I = I + 1

    If (I > 1000) Then
        For T1 = 1 To 7
            Debug.Print n(T1),
        Next
        Debug.Print " "
        I = 0
    End If
    DoEvents

Wend
Debug.Print Z

Ein Kommentar zu „Revising Cook et. al. data or where do the „97%“ come from?

  1. Sie werden auch hier kein Forum für Ihre dünngeistige Rabulistik bekommen, Herr K.! Ich würde Ihnen eher empfehlen, einen Therapeuten aufzusuchen. Logorrhoe (Sprechdurchfall) ist behandlungsbedürftig.

    PB

    Liken

Schreibe eine Antwort zu Peter Baier Antwort abbrechen

Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:

WordPress.com-Logo

Du kommentierst mit Deinem WordPress.com-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Google Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Google-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Twitter-Bild

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Facebook-Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Verbinde mit %s

Erstelle deine Website auf WordPress.com
Jetzt starten
%d Bloggern gefällt das: